๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ผ๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ ๐ง๐๐ผ ๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐. ๐ช๐ต๐ถ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ข๐ป๐ฒ ๐๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฌ๐ผ๐ ๐๐ป?ย โ๏ธ๐๏ธ
When I analyzed the last 10 years of Denver housing data, the overall market distribution looked strangeโit was a flat, messy plateau.
In statistics, thatโs a red flag. It usually means youโre looking at two different things pretending to be one.
So, I split the data by property type (Detached vs. Attached). The result? The “hidden” structure of our market was revealed.
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ง๐ฎ๐น๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ง๐๐ผ ๐๐ถ๐๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฏ๐๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐:
๐ต ๐ท๐๐ก๐๐โ๐๐ ๐ป๐๐๐๐ (The High-Beta Gear): Single-family homes are the drivers of Denver’s “upside surprise.” The distribution is heavily right-skewed (0.72). This means they capture the massive appreciation spikes during boom cycles. They have a “high ceiling,” but that comes with higher volatility.
๐ด ๐ด๐ก๐ก๐๐โ๐๐ ๐ป๐๐๐๐ (The Steady Gear): Condos and townhomes follow a remarkably symmetrical distribution (Skew: 0.04). Itโs almost a perfect bell curve. This is the “Stable” asset. It doesn’t hit the 20% growth peaks of detached homes, but it orbits its median with much more predictability.
๐ช๐ต๐ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐ผ๐:
If you only look at the “Market Average,” youโre making decisions based on a blend that doesn’t actually exist.
๐ผ๐๐ฃ๐๐ ๐ก๐๐๐ : Are you looking for the “Fat Tail” growth of a detached property, or the “Normal” consistency of an attached unit?
๐ป๐๐๐๐๐ค๐๐๐๐ : Your “equity velocity” depends entirely on which distribution curve you live on.
๐โ๐ ๐ท๐๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ก๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐๐:
Stop looking at “The Market”. Start looking at the structure. In Denver, we aren’t just seeing one housing market; weโre seeing two distinct financial regimes running in parallel.



